Comments on: Planning Officer reccomends Pye Homes application http://www.kscr.org.uk/blog/planning-officer-reccomends-pye-homes-application/ Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:48:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1 By: Wiseman http://www.kscr.org.uk/blog/planning-officer-reccomends-pye-homes-application/#comment-29 Wiseman Sun, 05 May 2013 10:48:22 +0000 http://www.kscr.org.uk/blog/?p=217#comment-29 It seems that even after exhaustive “consultations” and expensive professional reports, whatever the evidence overwhelmingly shows, the score is always Developers – 1, Sutton Courtenay Residents – 0
There is something radically wrong here isn’t there?
I think we need a new referee!

]]> By: Wiseman http://www.kscr.org.uk/blog/planning-officer-reccomends-pye-homes-application/#comment-24 Wiseman Sun, 05 May 2013 10:25:01 +0000 http://www.kscr.org.uk/blog/?p=217#comment-24 I agree Grumpy
This is a mad state of affairs, driven by an overwhelming desire to accept every planning application possible and make £millions in bonuses for the Vale.
They do not seem to appreciate the life changing devastation they are causing in our community, shame on them!

]]> By: Grumpywalrus http://www.kscr.org.uk/blog/planning-officer-reccomends-pye-homes-application/#comment-21 Grumpywalrus Sat, 04 May 2013 15:47:28 +0000 http://www.kscr.org.uk/blog/?p=217#comment-21 How on Earth can we get to a situation where a Planning Officer recommends a planning application in spite of:
-Thames Water telling him that the drainage infrastructure is unable to cope with the additional homes.
– All the surface water from the site is drained straight into Ginge Brook thereby significantly increasing the flooding risk of properties downstream from the proposed development.
– Overwhelming objections from local residents
– Insufficient traffic impact analysis

Deplorable behaviour.

]]>